Your FMEA is wrong.It just can’t tell you yet.

All outputs include source citations and require engineer sign-off before implementation. Edits are versioned with a full audit trail. We draft, your engineers decide. The result: experienced engineers cover 10 systems instead of 1, and new engineers learn faster from structured drafts than blank spreadsheets. Corrections feed back, so the next draft is better.

We start by scoring your data quality field by field. You see exactly where the gaps are before anything else happens. Then we work with whatever you have: messy records, PDFs, spreadsheets. The worse your data, the more value we add. For greenfield with no operational history, we work from design specs, BOMs, OEM manuals, and industry failure libraries. See how standardization works

Good. Upload them. We audit your existing analyses against actual field data: work orders, failure history, and inspection results. The output is a gap report showing which failure modes your current program misses, which severity ratings have drifted from reality, and which controls aren't performing. Most sites find 30-40% of failure modes are missing or outdated.

Generic AI produces rows that look like an FMEA but aren't traceable, deduplicated, or updatable. Our output is different: every row links to its source document with page-level citations. Failure modes are deduplicated against a domain taxonomy. Data quality is scored. And when source data changes, affected rows are flagged and risk scores recalculate. That's what generic AI can't do. See the full comparison

Deployed on your VPC (Azure, AWS, GCP) or on-premise. Dedicated database per customer. No data leaves your environment. Encryption at rest and in transit, MFA, RBAC, full audit trail. Air-gapped mode available for defense and classified environments. Full data export at any time.

We deliver in Excel, PDF, or directly into your PLM/CMMS - no new tool to learn. That's what Phase 1 is for: pick 1 system, get results in 3 weeks. If it doesn't meet your standard, you don't expand. Each phase has a go/no-go gate. In practice, experienced engineers adopt fastest because they recognize the quality.

Thirty years of institutional knowledge walks out the door. The replacement opens 50 spreadsheets and has no idea why severity was rated 8 or what "inadequate lubrication" means for that specific pump. Our system preserves the reasoning: every row has source citations, every correction is stored, every risk ranking traces back to evidence. Import your existing Excel FMEAs and we regenerate the reasoning your team never documented. The knowledge stays even when the person doesn't.

Your engineers spend 200+ hours per FMEA. Consultants charge $10-60K per system. We deliver in 3 weeks at a fraction of the cost. One avoided failure event pays for the engagement - multiply across your fleet. We include a business case package in every engagement for exactly this reason.