Tacit AI connects approved CMMS history, mill documents, and engineer judgment to source-traceable risk and maintenance proposals. Mill owners approve every priority and change.
Compare repeat events, maintenance burden, quality impact, and customer-defined lost-production consequence across paper-machine, pulp-line, and utility systems.
Tacit AI drafts FMEA/FMECA content from authorized work orders, manuals, drawings, and procedures. Every material claim links to a source or is marked as an assumption for engineer review.
Connect selected failure modes and asset consequence to proposed inspection, repair, and replacement work. Planners and technical owners decide what enters the outage package.
Compare proposed PM tasks and intervals with failure evidence, operating context, and current controls. Approved owners accept, revise, or reject each proposal before CMMS change control.
Show missing failure detail, conflicting document versions, and unsupported assumptions before they shape a risk or shutdown decision. The mill retains its existing systems of record.
Make approved troubleshooting, outage, and equipment knowledge searchable with citations and revision context. Shift teams can reuse known evidence without treating local experience as universal.
Select one critical system and one decision: production-loss priority, shutdown scope, or maintenance strategy. Agree the current baseline, approved source set, named engineering reviewers, and acceptance record before Tacit AI prepares any output.
Built for mill managers and functional leaders who must balance tonnes, quality, risk, maintenance spend, and scarce engineering capacity without bypassing technical authority.
Use a controlled sample of current work orders, event records, manuals, and existing analyses to test one active mill decision.
Prepare an initial source-linked risk and maintenance baseline from approved design and OEM evidence, with assumptions visible until operating history develops.
Tacit AI supports source-linked evidence preparation for customer-selected reliability, asset-management, environmental, and process-safety workflows. Qualified mill personnel determine applicability, approve decisions, and retain responsibility for compliance.
The mill defines the economic question, source boundary, reviewers, and evidence required for an expansion decision.
Customer-defined
Choose one critical system and agree the production or maintenance baseline, source set, deliverable, and named reviewers.
Gate
Proceed when the mill approves the evidence boundary and acceptance method.
Bounded pilot
Deliver cited analysis and maintenance proposals, an assumption log, and a structured engineering review record.
Gate
Compare review effort and decision usefulness with the agreed baseline.
After mill review
Authorized engineers approve or reject outputs. The economic buyer decides whether the measured evidence supports another system or process area.
Gate
Expand only against the mill’s agreed production, maintenance, and governance criteria.
Bring the critical-system boundary, recent event evidence, and the production or shutdown measure your team wants to improve.
