Tacit AI prepares source-linked FMEA and FMECA content, coverage questions, and proposed revisions for authorized engineering and safety personnel to assess. Program authority, classifications, safety objectives, and approval remain with the customer.
Structure candidate functions, failure conditions, modes, effects, causes, controls, and assumptions from approved requirements, architecture, drawings, BOMs, and prior analyses. Every proposal carries its source.
Compare analysis content with requirements, verification results, environmental tests, and interface evidence. Tacit AI exposes missing links and conflicts for the responsible engineer; it does not assign safety classifications or objectives.
Relate service bulletins, removals, maintenance findings, and reliability records to candidate analysis updates. Applicability by aircraft, system, supplier, effectivity, and configuration is preserved for review.
Organize failure-effect, detection, and task evidence for a customer-controlled MSG-3 or maintenance-program workflow where applicable. Authorized specialists determine consequence categories, task selection, and intervals.
Route proposed revisions through named roles, record approvals and rejections, and export accepted content to the designated system of record. No field or approved analysis changes without customer authorization.
Define supplier, export-control, configuration, and system-interface boundaries before evidence moves. Program owners approve access and any transfer into controlled engineering systems.
Built for VP Engineering, Chief Engineer, Safety, Reliability, Quality, and MRO leaders at airframers, system suppliers, and operators who need controlled evidence preparation across complex configurations.
Prepare traceable analysis content and change-impact questions from the approved development baseline. Authorized personnel determine ARP4754A/ARP4761 process applicability, classifications, objectives, and acceptance.
Connect maintenance and service evidence to affected analysis content without assuming that one event, fleet, or configuration generalizes to another.
The customer selects the governing contract, authority guidance, process, and edition. Tacit AI supports evidence preparation; authorized personnel retain engineering, safety, airworthiness, and certification decisions.
Timing follows source access, security review, configuration complexity, and the customer’s review process—not a preset delivery promise.
Customer-defined
Select one subsystem and effectivity, authoritative sources, governing methods, exclusions, data handling, output contract, and authorized reviewers.
GateBoundary and responsibilities approved
One analysis package
Compare proposed content and coverage findings with the accepted baseline. Measure traceable-source coverage, unsupported assumptions found, reviewer effort, and accepted versus rejected proposals.
GateAuthorized reviewers confirm value and control
After validation
Agree configuration rules, change control, interfaces, access, and deployment boundary before adding analyses, systems, or programs.
GateProgram owner authorizes expansion
Bring the system boundary, governing method, approved baseline, and one evidence set to trace.
