Tacit AI prepares source-linked FMEA evidence from approved design, process, supplier, and field records. Engineers review every proposed rating, control, and change before it enters the program record.
Prepare candidate functions, failure modes, effects, causes, controls, and ratings from approved specifications, BOMs, drawings, process flows, and prior FMEAs. Each proposal retains its source and is held for qualified engineering review.
Compare approved DFMEA characteristics with process flow, PFMEA, control-plan, and verification evidence. Tacit AI proposes links and exposes breaks; program owners decide the required classification, control, and PPAP content.
Relate warranty, 8D, test, return, and supplier records to affected FMEA content. Similarity is presented as evidence for review, with program, component, market, and configuration differences preserved.
Route proposed row-level revisions through named reviewers, retain source citations and decision history, then export approved content to the customer’s quality or FMEA system. Tacit AI does not approve safety characteristics or customer submissions.
“We evaluated Tacit AI for Design FMEA on a critical power electronics subsystem. The structured output and the approach to connecting information exceeded expectations.”
Design Engineer, Top 10 Global OEM — separate DFMEA evaluation, Europe
Built for VP Engineering, Quality, Manufacturing, APQP, and Supplier Quality leaders at OEMs and Tier suppliers who need better evidence flow without bypassing design authority or customer-specific requirements.
Compare legacy FMEAs, engineering changes, supplier submissions, warranty evidence, and current controls. Reviewers see source-linked differences before deciding what should change.
Use approved specifications, BOMs, DVP&R inputs, process definitions, and customer requirements to prepare a structured baseline. Your cross-functional team owns ratings, characteristics, controls, and release.
Workflows can be configured around the applicable edition and customer program. Support for evidence preparation does not certify an organization, approve a PPAP, or satisfy an OEM requirement by itself.
The customer defines the baseline, source set, reviewers, output template, and acceptance criteria before work begins.
Customer-defined
Select one subsystem or process, identify authoritative documents and data rights, record OEM requirements, and name engineering and quality approvers.
GateSources, owners, exclusions, and baseline approved
One bounded use case
Prepare a draft and coverage review. Measure reviewer effort, source traceability, accepted versus rejected proposals, and material gaps found against the agreed baseline.
GateNamed reviewers confirm usefulness and control
Only after validation
Agree system-of-record handoff, permissions, change control, and program-specific reuse rules before adding products, suppliers, plants, or integrations.
GateBusiness owner authorizes the next scope
Bring the governing requirement, one approved FMEA, and the source evidence you want traced.
