Tacit AI connects work orders, OEM documents, and site knowledge to source-traceable FMECA, PRT, and PMI proposals. Reliability engineers approve every change before it enters the maintenance strategy.
Bring failure frequency, maintenance cost, downtime consequence, and operating context into one asset view. Site leaders choose the bad actors and repeat events worth engineering effort.
Tacit AI prepares FMECA proposals from authorized work orders, manuals, procedures, and existing analyses. Each material assertion links to its source or is marked as an assumption for reliability-team review.
Compare proposed PRTs, PMIs, inspections, and task intervals with the failure evidence and production consequence. P-F analysis is proposed only where the available condition and event history can support it.
Draft work instructions and maintenance changes remain proposals until authorized owners review safety steps, site conditions, parts, and document-control requirements. Approved outputs can then be mapped to the customer’s CMMS process.
Search cited manuals, procedures, and event records together. New events trigger proposed revisions with a visible source and change history; engineers decide whether the approved baseline changes.
Assess asset identity, event coding, operating context, and document currency before analysis. Gaps stay visible so reliability teams know which conclusions the evidence can support.
Built for mine and processing leaders who must defend production-risk priorities, clear analysis backlogs, and convert event history into controlled maintenance action.
Use selected work orders, event reports, manuals, and existing analyses to test whether Tacit AI improves one live reliability decision without replacing the system of record.
Prepare an initial risk and maintenance baseline from approved design and OEM evidence, with assumptions clearly separated until site history becomes available.
Tacit AI can structure analysis to customer-selected methods. IEC 60812 supports FMEA/FMECA practice; ISO 14224 supports equipment and reliability-data taxonomy where applicable; SAE JA1011/JA1012 support an RCM process when the customer chooses that method. MIL-STD-1629A is cancelled but may still be contractually invoked. Method selection, risk acceptance, and approval remain with the customer.
The customer sets the baseline, reviewers, evidence boundary, and economic measure before work starts.
Customer-defined
Select one critical system or repeat event. Agree source access, current effort, production consequence, output, and authorized reviewers.
Gate
Proceed when the evidence boundary and acceptance method are agreed.
Bounded pilot
Deliver cited FMECA and maintenance proposals, an assumption log, and a review record for the selected scope.
Gate
Compare review effort, evidence coverage, and decision quality with the agreed baseline.
After customer review
Authorized owners accept, revise, or reject each proposal. The business sponsor decides whether evidence supports expansion to another system or site.
Gate
Expand only against agreed production, maintenance, and governance criteria.
Bring the event record, current FMECA, and relevant OEM evidence. We will define a bounded review with your reliability owner.
