Tacit AI connects approved manuals, work orders, engineering notes, and tool history into source-linked evidence for reliability and fab teams. Engineers approve guidance and risk changes; associations with yield remain hypotheses until validated.
Search approved manuals, SOPs, work orders, and engineering notes by symptom, module, chamber, component, and configuration. Answers cite their source so engineers can judge applicability before use.
Prepare candidate functions, failure modes, effects, causes, controls, and maintenance links from authorized evidence. Tool owners review every proposal and retain responsibility for procedures, risk ratings, and release.
Surface recurring evidence across comparable tools while preserving model, chamber, process, recipe, age, modification, supplier, and fab differences. Reuse occurs only after an owner confirms applicability.
Combine maintenance, fault, excursion, qualification, and process context to rank questions worth investigating. Tacit AI presents associations and alternative explanations—not proof that maintenance caused a yield outcome.
Use role-based review, source citations, decision history, and controlled export. Deployment, access, retention, intellectual-property boundaries, and integration are agreed before production use.
Check timestamps, tool identity, chamber, recipe, and maintenance coding before comparing events. Missing context remains visible so fab teams can judge whether a pattern is usable.
Built for fab operations, equipment engineering, process engineering, yield, reliability, maintenance, and equipment-OEM leaders who need evidence to move across shifts and sites without scoring employees or bypassing tool ownership.
Connect existing records to recurring symptoms and risk content, then let qualified engineers decide which prior interventions apply to the current tool and process context.
Organize OEM documentation, acceptance evidence, local procedures, and known risks before operating history matures. Customer and OEM authorities own qualification and process release.
Standards apply only to the scoped workflow and selected edition. SEMI S2 is environmental, health, and safety guidance for semiconductor manufacturing equipment; it is not a cybersecurity control framework.
The fab defines the tool boundary, data rights, systems, reviewers, baseline, and success measures before analysis begins.
Customer-defined
Choose one tool family and use case, map configurations and data lineage, identify approved sources, agree access and IP controls, and select known cases for evaluation.
GateSources, baseline, owners, and exclusions approved
One bounded pilot
Measure retrieval against known cases, citation validity, reviewer effort, accepted risk proposals, and unsupported assumptions. Any yield analysis documents lag, matching, confounders, and uncertainty.
GateTool and process owners accept the evidence
After validation
Agree interfaces, review ownership, change control, monitoring, and rules for tool-to-tool or fab-to-fab reuse before extending the deployment.
GateBusiness owner authorizes expansion
Bring known incidents, approved fixes, tool configuration, and the operational question you need the evidence to answer.
