Tacit AI turns work orders, manuals, and engineering evidence into source-linked FMEAs—so repeat risk is exposed, critical assets are prioritized, and maintenance strategy improves before the next stoppage.
Draft functions, failure modes, effects, causes, controls, and ratings from approved technical and maintenance sources. Every proposal links to evidence or is marked as an assumption.
Combine failure frequency, repair burden, and production consequence to focus FMEA review on the assets that matter most to throughput, safety, and cost.
Compare new failures, repairs, and operating changes with the approved analysis. Affected rows are proposed for review instead of silently changing the controlled FMEA.
Link failure modes to proposed inspections, PM tasks, intervals, and mitigating actions. Engineering and maintenance owners approve every strategy change.
Expose missing failure codes, weak work-order detail, outdated documents, and unsupported ratings before they undermine the analysis.
Search the manuals, drawings, procedures, and prior decisions behind each FMEA. Teams can verify the approved source before acting.
Plant, maintenance, reliability, and engineering leaders use one governed workflow while retaining control of every risk and maintenance decision.
Start with one production-critical system, its current FMEA, work orders, manuals, and known repeat failures.
Prepare a source-linked initial risk baseline from approved design and OEM evidence, keeping assumptions explicit until operating history exists.
Tacit AI can structure customer-reviewed work to IEC 60812 FMEA/FMECA practice, ISO 14224 taxonomies where appropriate, and SAE JA1011/JA1012 criteria when an RCM process is selected. These methods do not confer certification or replace plant engineering approval.
Your sponsor and technical owner define the system boundary, approved sources, reviewers, baseline, and expansion criteria.
Customer-defined
Select one critical system, the current analysis, known failure history, authoritative documents, and review method.
Gate
Proceed when scope, users, sources, and acceptance criteria are approved.
Bounded deployment
Prepare a source-linked FMEA draft and coverage review. Capture accepted rows, corrections, assumptions, gaps, and reviewer effort.
Gate
Compare observed workflow and review outcomes with the agreed baseline.
After customer review
Technical owners approve content and process changes. The economic buyer decides whether the measured capacity and risk benefit justify expansion.
Gate
Expand only to named assets, teams, and documents under the agreed controls.
Bring the current FMEA, representative work orders, and the source documents your engineers trust.
